That was the Chatty we know. Not sure what’s happened his last few games. Glad he’s back.
timmablimma
Oh no. Anyways
Like17Badgers
oh no … anyway
tbyrdistheword
Good
Clark828
I feel bad for the dude because he has potential, but he’s just so inconsistent and doesn’t have the chemistry. Been pissed that Chatty was out though
JKthePolishGhost
I think we played better without him but I do think he positively impacts the power play.
AostheGreat
Please.
greg19735
These charts are always a bit silly. but specifically here Turbo, Aho, Jarvis, Slavin and Burns are at least -.75 on defense.
MrWillM
Yeah you say that now, wait until Burns gets benched.
macaroni_3000
Orlov and TDA = proven disaster
Orlov and Chatfield = look pretty much like the 3rd pairing you’d expect to see on a a perennial top 5 team
IDK, this ain’t rocket science. If I had to critique any aspect of how the roster has been managed since Rod took over, it’s the third defensive pair. We drafted Fleury, who played fine but always seemed to be on a short leash for no apparent reason.
Then bring in guys like Edmundson and Hakanpaa but don’t keep them around, and then we end up with some dude in camp who looks great and I’m thinking “this dude might be better than Brett Pesce”…..except we cut him and yeahhhh, that was Gustav Forsling.
And I’m not saying Orlov is a bust or anything, but we could’ve kept Gostisbehere for way less than we paid Orlov.
TL;DR: Rod and/or DW don’t seem able to believe what their eyes tell them about depth d-men. IDK. It’s weird.
squarephanatic
CHATMANDU
Heartofgoldband77
And for this, on today of all days, I am thankful.
w41twh4t
Wow, absolute proof not only that Chatfeld needs to replace TDA but also that Slavin and burns need to be benched. Well done!
15 Comments
good 🙂
That was the Chatty we know. Not sure what’s happened his last few games. Glad he’s back.
Oh no. Anyways
oh no
…
anyway
Good
I feel bad for the dude because he has potential, but he’s just so inconsistent and doesn’t have the chemistry. Been pissed that Chatty was out though
I think we played better without him but I do think he positively impacts the power play.
Please.
These charts are always a bit silly. but specifically here Turbo, Aho, Jarvis, Slavin and Burns are at least -.75 on defense.
Yeah you say that now, wait until Burns gets benched.
Orlov and TDA = proven disaster
Orlov and Chatfield = look pretty much like the 3rd pairing you’d expect to see on a a perennial top 5 team
IDK, this ain’t rocket science. If I had to critique any aspect of how the roster has been managed since Rod took over, it’s the third defensive pair. We drafted Fleury, who played fine but always seemed to be on a short leash for no apparent reason.
Then bring in guys like Edmundson and Hakanpaa but don’t keep them around, and then we end up with some dude in camp who looks great and I’m thinking “this dude might be better than Brett Pesce”…..except we cut him and yeahhhh, that was Gustav Forsling.
And I’m not saying Orlov is a bust or anything, but we could’ve kept Gostisbehere for way less than we paid Orlov.
TL;DR: Rod and/or DW don’t seem able to believe what their eyes tell them about depth d-men. IDK. It’s weird.
CHATMANDU
And for this, on today of all days, I am thankful.
Wow, absolute proof not only that Chatfeld needs to replace TDA but also that Slavin and burns need to be benched. Well done!
Cool by me!!