Mastodon
@National Hockey League

Should this be embellishment?



Should this be embellishment?



by Instant-Highlights

30 Comments

  1. defigravity42

    No, he’s lifting the stick to get it out of the way

  2. sniff-my-babcock

    They can’t add a penalty on the review, only determine if it was a high stick

  3. Atomic_tortoise

    No OPs never had a stick to the face that shit hurts

  4. It’s not embellishment, he took a stick to the face so he’s not faking. He lifted the stick though so it’s no penalty, but I don’t think he intended to hit himself. That’s the right call after the review.

  5. He’s trying to throw the stick behind him, watch the hand movement

  6. togocann49

    Not at all. He was trying to get stick out of the way, not to hit himself. He wasn’t trying to draw a penalty, though he may have closed his hand on another players stick, and that’s a no-no

  7. Lost-Horse558

    Lots of opinions here from people who have clearly never played a fast paced sport at a high level. The guy got a fucking stick to the face unexpectedly. That’s exactly how you would respond.

  8. TucsonTacos

    Its not like he immediately crumpled to the ice from it

  9. Isn’t it a penalty to hold (or grab) another players stick?

  10. I don’t think he tried to hit himself on purpose but once he got hit he tried to sell it as hard as he possibly could.

  11. They were going down like flies. More like soccer players than hockey players.

  12. ChuckFeathers

    Show it in realtime, slomo is very deceptive as to reaction *time*..

  13. If not embellishment then definitely it’s embarrassment

  14. stephenlipic

    Grabbing your opponent’s stick is a penalty, but I guess they can’t call it after the fact?

    But you know those refs are sending a memo to the rest of the zebras.

  15. Fastsmitty47

    Shouldn’t be a high stick or embellishment either. Looks like he unintentionally swung the stick into his own face

  16. chemicalsubtitle

    Should have been a 4 minute penalty against the Wings.

  17. onlysmallcats

    I’ve never played hockey, but I think I’d react the same way if I took a piece of carbon fibre to the teeth.

  18. vanyel196

    It looked to me like Razor was trying to throw the stick off and ended up eating it. It was the right-ish call as much as I hate to say that. Overall? Lot’s of trashy plays from the rangers.

  19. frocarter

    Fuck you, you’re getting a fucking embellishment!

  20. hardware1197

    If you are saying he purposely took the opponent’s stick and smashed his own face with it – that’s a stretch. What happened after he smashed his own face with his opponent’s stick wasn’t embellished- it looked real as fuck.

  21. He was certainly not selling it. As someone who played hockey their entire life, getting hit by a sti anywhere without protection can hurt a tremendous amount. Especially in the face. You dont realize the pain until youve had it happen

  22. 35Richter

    No. If anything it should be 2 minutes for holding the stick

  23. bluAstrid

    Rule 8.1 – Holding

    Holding is any action by a player that restrains an opposing player by impeding their progress whether or not they are in possession of the puck, or by such action prohibiting their ability to pass, shoot, receive, or otherwise propel the puck.

    A player is permitted to use their arm in a strength move, by blocking their opponent, provided they have body position and are not using their hands in a holding manner, when doing so.

    While players are permitted to block an opponent’s stick with their hands, arms, or body, they are not permitted to hold an opponent’s stick.

    A Minor penalty will be assessed to any player who holds an opponent in any manner.

    **A Minor Penalty will be assessed to a player who holds an opponent’s stick. This penalty will be assessed and announced as “holding the stick”.**

Write A Comment