Mastodon
@Vancouver Canucks

Thomas Drance on the Elias Lindholm trade, Chris Tanev and more



Thomas Drance from The Athletic joined the guys to recap his thoughts on the Elias Lindholm trade, if a Chris Tanev trade could still work and more.

27 Comments

  1. I love the love/hate relationship that Drance has with Dhaliwal 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  2. Drance calling out his regression – priceless. lol. He really is the most sober and rationale critic of this team out there. Great stuff

  3. Nevermind the 80.00% pk rate.. but by the eye test alone our PK has been lights out. The hell does this guy smoke when he gets up?

  4. 10 other teams want Tanev. So there are bidders that drive up the price for him. The management is good with current defenders on the team. Maybe another depth defenseman fitting our available cap space is the smarter thing to do. July 1 free agency looks like a better shot for Tanev when it seems like it is too rich for the Canucks at this point in time.

  5. flams' asking price is too high for tanev now. we'd probably bring a couple useful defense pieces, then we'd be done

  6. Does drance know that everything he says on radio and writes people have access to?? He’s literally been wrong about everything about this team 😂

  7. Lot of people are worried we gave up too much for Lindholm, but remember, Kuzmenko has one more year at 5.5M. Freeing up that much salary cap space for next year probably cost the Nucks two assets alone. And it makes the deal, whether they get to the Cup or not, a massive win.

  8. Bad trade long term, but short term is good. But if the nuckleheads don’t go far in the playoffs, then Lindholm doesn’t sign, this STINKS!

  9. Rick: When's your regression coming.
    Drance: Oh, it happened this year, what do you mean. I regressed big time.

    😆😆😆

  10. Rick you are the epitome of calling the kettle black . You are absolutely killing all the listeners . Seriously get rid of Rick .

  11. I have been hoping that the Canucks would not bring in Tanev, not because I do not like the player, but because he is 1) too pricey to bring in; 2) too easily injured because of the style he plays and would play if he re-joins this team, and 3) his declining speed does not fit well with the style this team wants and needs to play. I do think the team needs to try and add a depth D-man still, but please do not trade with Calgary again and do not bring in Tanev…

  12. Rutherfords good luck "Drance" listen to him every day. And never do anything he says. And be 1st in the NHL.

  13. the guy that knows nothing says nothing and gives us nothing. Just a complete waste of time.

Write A Comment