Mastodon
@Vegas Golden Knights

Jack Eichel receives game misconduct for spearing Kirll Kaprizov | NHL on ESPN



Vegas’ Jack Eichel receives a five minute major penalty and a game misconduct for spearing Minnesota’ Kirill Kaprizov.

✔️ Subscribe to ESPN+ https://plus.espn.com/
✔️ Get the ESPN App: http://www.espn.com/espn/apps/espn
✔️ Subscribe to ESPN on YouTube: http://es.pn/SUBSCRIBEtoYOUTUBE
✔️Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoESPNFC
✔️Subscribe to NBA on ESPN on YouTube: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoNBAonESPN
✔️Watch ESPN on YouTube TV: http://es.pn/YouTubeTV

#NHL

24 Comments

  1. Biased commentators stating there was no movement (spearing motion), and the replay clearly shows he does move his arms. The danger of placing a stick into another players mid-section is very real. These guys do not wear metal armor.

  2. And as a Sabres fan, happy Eichel stood up for himself. Kaprizov got in sneaky crosscheck, got what he deserved and embellished it. Typical European tactics. Ask Bobby Clarke about the Soviet Summit series.

  3. In 531 games played this was his first major and his first game misconduct.
    Now he needs 272 more majors to tie Tie Domi, and 39 more game misconducts to tie Tim Hunter 😄

  4. This call was so weak. Sounded like the refs had to choose between a 5 or 2 minute? Eichel slightly moved his stick towards Kaprizov, but not in a spearing motion. It looked like he was just trying to hold his stick against the body of 97. That’s common, we see that happen all the time when players use their stick to get their opponent uncomfortable, so long as they don’t commit in obvious penalty. At most he was trying to slash or hook him. Even thats tough to tell if thats what he was doing. But nothing worth 5 minutes and getting ejected. Kaprizov skated right into the stick. It looked like Kaprizov may have sold that for more than what it was. Tough to tell really. Jack supposed to reposition himself or his stick because Kaprizov isn’t moving out of the way? There was no intent to spear him, that’s pretty obvious. Not sure if the refs assumed it was retaliation for the cross check they missed or what. Very surprised to see a player get ejected when he barely moved his stick. Is he supposed to get his stick out of the way if someone is skating into it? He’s holding his stick how any player would if it’s not on the ice.
    End of the day it doesn’t matter, Knight got the dub. I don’t see the NHL doing much more than a fine. If anything it would be nice to hear the NHL explain this rule in a bit more detail.

  5. I'd say it's similar to the Benn play where he cross checked him a bit , forget that vegas fools name, anyway it's reversed. Only thing it's not a big playoff game. Benn got major and two game suspension for literally a crosscheck. It only looked bad because the dude flopped. The intent to injure might have been there, as is this play

Write A Comment