Mastodon
@National Hockey League

No penalty called after review



No penalty called after review



by No_Feedback_630

42 Comments

  1. What penalty? The puck hit Crosby’s face at the same time that the stick hit the puck.

    Still confused by that one.

  2. Honest-Respect-1635

    “I didn’t hit his face; I hit the puck into his face”

    Big difference.

  3. It appears the refs stared at the solar eclipse today and have gone completely blind! Lol

  4. Accurate_Apricot9246

    Great vid bud! 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

  5. How was there no penalty? Wow. That’s some BS. The Avs got a double-minor penalty for something not even half as bad yesterday against the Stars.

  6. Thirlstane_Brawler

    Puck got in the way of Sid being decapitated

  7. Throwawayaccount0689

    So as long as the puck hits first, you can basically Michigan someone in the face I guess?

  8. Routine-Pass-8486

    Puck ran interference between face and stick

  9. SyphiliticPlatypus

    Refs have called the Leafs for five incredibly soft penalties so far in this game and reverse a double minor call on this one.

    Just NhL ReFing y’all.

  10. commodore_stab1789

    Called 4 mins 2x minor.

    They review and see this and decided no penalty. I am amazed.

  11. creepsnutsandpervs

    I was shocked.

    On a side note I lost my shit after that when Crosby got hit shortly after that and whoever is talking for the leafs goes “they gonna blow the whistle every time Crosby gets hit?”

  12. If you look at the other angle, he didn’t hit him with his stick, so no penalty

  13. Objective_Weird_7626

    What the hell is wrong with your tv?

  14. Fun_Ad_6924

    3 dirty plays against Crosby this game , if I’m the Penguins I’m headhunting Matthews

  15. inkylaughingoctopus

    The comments here are f-ing bizarre… like the stick hit the face. I’ve heard people in Toronto are short a few IQ points and should be treated with care but like bruh, this is a video of a stick hitting the dude in the face.

  16. 4r7is1if3

    These refs/the control room may end up costing a team a playoff series. Ridiculous.

  17. Do_Whatever_You_Like

    This is becoming a fantastic sub for aspiring hall monitors.

  18. Internal_Ad_2528

    I swear I thought this was ea nhl at first

  19. Fastsmitty47

    They REVIEWED this and called no penalty??!!

  20. His face was in the way of the puck and clean stick contact with the puck. Besides this guy has had so many calls go his way, wahhhhhh!

  21. Coopdawg1987

    The amount of people in this sub saying this should’ve been a penalty proves why there are so many review calls that they seem to get wrong from my vantage. Whether it’s live or review, it is subjective. Stick doesn’t make contact with body = no penalty.

  22. Massive-Challenge849

    Clearly no penalty as it’s a follow through the puck was touched first by textbook that is no penalty. Same rule apply to passing and shooting you can hit a person with a high stick as long as it’s a continuation

  23. jpod_david

    I think they’re essentially saying it was a high stick on the puck, not a high stick infraction (621d)

  24. Level_Watercress1153

    I thought this was a video game at first lol wtf

  25. CMPUTX486

    NHL has already selected who will be the final spot for the playoffs

  26. Reckless ass bullshit, dumb fuck got away with it.

  27. nospmiSca

    He was clearly shooting the puck above shoulder height, and crosby was in the way of his follow-through. This means no infraction on the play.

  28. InvestigatorFull2498

    There’s a better angle that shows the stick bouncing back off the puck and not touch his face very clearly.

Write A Comment