I heard some people saying that Canucks should temper their expectations based on a poor second half, but there really isn't a huge difference. If the Canucks played at the same rate as the first half for the whole season they would have gotten 114 points tied for first with New York, but if they'd played at the same rate as the second half for the whole season they would have gotten 104 points tied for ninth with Edmonton.
by Canadian96
6 Comments
if you only read this sub, you’d think we played the second half about as well as San Jose did
Chicago really was the most consistent team throughout the year
Funny that the media were clamoring over the Oilers in the second half, but they were only 2 points better.
“Look Lisa, you can see the exact moment Petey’s knee rips in half”
FYI, your Change Rank and Points columns are switched
Bruins and Canucks got high on the same supply..