Pang sucked too if we’re being entirely honest. He and Vosters have no chemistry, Pang’s commentary isn’t what it was prior either. Vosters has a great voice and tone but still isn’t good at the play. Call me crazy but Chelios was the most consistent in the booth last year.
MikeandTheMangosteen
Vosters is just awful
JD397
Such a shame after we were treated for so long with Pat & Edzo.
WarmBedards
I think the person that Vosters had the most chemistry with was Stu Grimson.
EddyTheDesigner
Id love Wiedeman and Pang together. I didn’t see him moving from the radio both though
bigslick
Feels high.
three_valves
You can’t put all the blame on Pang. Vosters is a mess. He has a good voice but he is a baseball announcer trying to do hockey. He has almost no clue about the game.
AlpineBuilds
Lacrosse style scooooooreeee
Foolsauce420
At no time this season was it more apparent than when Kaner scored in overtime at the UC. The Red Wings call from Mickey and Ken made that an eternal hockey moment. Vosters lost me for good that day unfortunately.
Repulsive-Office-796
We had such a good duo for years which made watching a bad team somewhat tolerable.
mjm8218
All true
RemingtonSnatch
I like Vosters. He’s just inexperienced. But I think dumping him would be a mistake because I think in time he will be a great one.
EddySea
Really the only reason we are not 32nd is because of the Boston PxP guy having some mental block that affected his cadence.
WhiteFudge92
This doesn’t surprise me. I tried to give Vosters the benefit of the doubt since he’s still relatively new, but my God he sounds so flat, doesn’t sound like he knows what’s going on and doesn’t really provide any insight to any player on either team. Man we were spoiled during the Hawks heyday. Thank God the radio team is still working together
15 Comments
Source: [https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5521206/2024/06/06/nhl-broadcast-rankings-tv-2024-commentator/](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5521206/2024/06/06/nhl-broadcast-rankings-tv-2024-commentator/)
Pang sucked too if we’re being entirely honest. He and Vosters have no chemistry, Pang’s commentary isn’t what it was prior either. Vosters has a great voice and tone but still isn’t good at the play. Call me crazy but Chelios was the most consistent in the booth last year.
Vosters is just awful
Such a shame after we were treated for so long with Pat & Edzo.
I think the person that Vosters had the most chemistry with was Stu Grimson.
Id love Wiedeman and Pang together. I didn’t see him moving from the radio both though
Feels high.
You can’t put all the blame on Pang. Vosters is a mess. He has a good voice but he is a baseball announcer trying to do hockey. He has almost no clue about the game.
Lacrosse style scooooooreeee
At no time this season was it more apparent than when Kaner scored in overtime at the UC. The Red Wings call from Mickey and Ken made that an eternal hockey moment. Vosters lost me for good that day unfortunately.
We had such a good duo for years which made watching a bad team somewhat tolerable.
All true
I like Vosters. He’s just inexperienced. But I think dumping him would be a mistake because I think in time he will be a great one.
Really the only reason we are not 32nd is because of the Boston PxP guy having some mental block that affected his cadence.
This doesn’t surprise me. I tried to give Vosters the benefit of the doubt since he’s still relatively new, but my God he sounds so flat, doesn’t sound like he knows what’s going on and doesn’t really provide any insight to any player on either team. Man we were spoiled during the Hawks heyday. Thank God the radio team is still working together