This coming season he’s going to realize, “oh shit, I’m elite”, and score over 50 goals and 100 points.
han5henman
“I don’t know, he was pretty invisible in that last playoff game” – probably kneejerk
kneejerk_nuck
He owes us one after that playoff finale.
YouCanFucough
In what universe is Brock Boeser only a 24% defensive forward
Dependent_Ad4898
Maybe the stats don’t reflect it but I thought Brock was great defensively this year.
ArcaneX1234
They wont let him walk to free agency. He will be signed before the season starts
Ok-Guess4385
I’m not very wise in terms of stats but a consistent career 20 goal season kind of guy has to be worth something to this team right?
Appropriate_Side9971
Can someone explain why his ev offence is so low? Their line seemed quite effective all season and his player card reads quite high in everything else offence related.
SpectreFire
Based on the Lindholm and Guentzel deals, I think, he’s worth about 7m x 7 in free agency if he gets another 30+ goal and 70+ point season.
I think if you go max term, you can probably get him on 6 – 6.5m x 8, that’s 52m in total cost.
WhenInAaronRome
Yeah, let’s see!
– JT Miller’s Ass in a goalie crease
eexxiitt
He should be a lock for 30 goals but he’s unlikely to score on 20% of his shots again.
rengorengar
Advanced stats are nice and all but I think hockey is probably one of the sports where it’s not very effective in determining how good players are just because so much of hockey is just a lucky bounce here and there. We’re starting to treat like these stat cards and gamescore cards as like the baseline for evaluating players or something when they really should just be given a quick glance and nothing more.
NerdPunch
It really seems like it’s his zone entries, zone exits, and skating speed, hits and passes that really drag down his overall score.
But that’s just not Brocks game. He’s a shooter/finisher, that plays a good off puck game and gets to the goal scoring area’s.
He’s *not* gonna generate a bunch of rush offence, or be the guy carrying the puck through the neutral zone. He’s going to get open and bury his chances.
13 Comments
This coming season he’s going to realize, “oh shit, I’m elite”, and score over 50 goals and 100 points.
“I don’t know, he was pretty invisible in that last playoff game” – probably kneejerk
He owes us one after that playoff finale.
In what universe is Brock Boeser only a 24% defensive forward
Maybe the stats don’t reflect it but I thought Brock was great defensively this year.
They wont let him walk to free agency. He will be signed before the season starts
I’m not very wise in terms of stats but a consistent career 20 goal season kind of guy has to be worth something to this team right?
Can someone explain why his ev offence is so low? Their line seemed quite effective all season and his player card reads quite high in everything else offence related.
Based on the Lindholm and Guentzel deals, I think, he’s worth about 7m x 7 in free agency if he gets another 30+ goal and 70+ point season.
I think if you go max term, you can probably get him on 6 – 6.5m x 8, that’s 52m in total cost.
Yeah, let’s see!
– JT Miller’s Ass in a goalie crease
He should be a lock for 30 goals but he’s unlikely to score on 20% of his shots again.
Advanced stats are nice and all but I think hockey is probably one of the sports where it’s not very effective in determining how good players are just because so much of hockey is just a lucky bounce here and there. We’re starting to treat like these stat cards and gamescore cards as like the baseline for evaluating players or something when they really should just be given a quick glance and nothing more.
It really seems like it’s his zone entries, zone exits, and skating speed, hits and passes that really drag down his overall score.
But that’s just not Brocks game. He’s a shooter/finisher, that plays a good off puck game and gets to the goal scoring area’s.
He’s *not* gonna generate a bunch of rush offence, or be the guy carrying the puck through the neutral zone. He’s going to get open and bury his chances.