Mastodon
@New York Rangers

Does Mike Richter deserve to be considered for the Hall of Fame?



Does Mike Richter deserve to be considered for the Hall of Fame?

by SquashMarks

13 Comments

  1. SquashMarks

    Career Summary

    Seasons 14

    Playoff Appearances 8

    GP
    666

    W
    301

    L
    258

    T
    73

    SHO
    24

    MIN
    38,183

    GAA
    2.89

    SV%
    .904

    1 Stanley Cup

    5 Top 10 Vezina Award Finishes

  2. Stonewall30NY

    No. He was very good but not hall of fame good in my opinion

  3. sentry_87

    The 9 year old in me says absolutely. The 37 year old me says maybe, on the borderline. He had some crazy saves and Rangers would definitely be in an 84 year cup drought without him. Compare him to Hasek, Osgood, Roy, Brodeur of that era; he’s definitely in the mix?

  4. AARP_Rocky

    No, and it’s not really a particularly close call either.

    Richter was obviously a very good goalie, but I honestly think the HOF has been diluted a bit recently.

    For instance, I don’t think Tom Barrasso or Mike Vernon were worthy of induction either.

  5. Buckaroo--Banzai

    Team legend, but a bit short of the hall.

  6. lionson76

    He’s in the USA Hockey Hall of Fame, but I don’t think he should be in the ~~NHL’s~~ HHOF.

  7. Accomplished-One7476

    That is an awesome picture of Micky Dolenz in his young years

  8. MathBallThunder

    I just want to say going straight from Richter to Henrik to Igor (with 2 Mike Dunham seasons between Richter and Hank) over 30 years is just fuckin unbelievable

  9. -RomeoZulu-

    I love me Mike Richter but no. He’s in that Hextall, CuJo, Vernon, Beezer tier. Barrasso doesn’t belong, but the solution isn’t to let the next 5-10 similar goalies in too.

  10. Shiny_Mew76

    If he played longer and played like the 94’ season, he would be in. He was incredible that season.

  11. baronvonpenguin

    Wasn’t he the winningest US born goalie for a long time?

    That might be hall worthy.

Write A Comment