Join this channel to access perks ✅ http://brodie.bz/join
MY AVIATION CHANNEL ✈️ http://brodie.bz/Aviation
HOME STUDIO PRO 🎥 http://brodie.bz/Production
📺 Subscribe ➡️ http://brodie.bz/YouTube
📸 Instagram ➡️ http://brodie.bz/IG
📰 Features ➡️ http://brodie.bz/Read
🎧 Podcast ➡️ http://brodie.bz/Apple
✳️ Spotify ➡️ http://brodie.bz/Spotify
🐦 Twitter ➡️ http://brodie.bz/TW
👍 Facebook ➡️ http://brodie.bz/FB
23 Comments
Leafs point tax.. 1/4 point awarded to the leafs for each NHL game that goes to OT
They better not make this OT change. This would go horrible. In every way.
2 points for a win
1 point for a shoot out win
0 points if you lose
Sounds like the Over and Back violation in basketball
Just get rid of the shootout. If it ends in a tie after five minutes, it ends in a tie.
3-on-3 is terrible to watch. They should go back to either 4-on-4 or 5-on-5.
I think we should implement the 3-2-1 standing system that the PWHL has. If you win in regulation you get 3 points and the opposing team gets zero. If you win in overtime, you get 2 points, but your opponent gets one point. Also, if this goes to a shootout, the winner of the shootout still gets two points and the opposing team gets 1 point.
Sure I know what a phone booth is. It's the old name for Oracle Park. (I'll show myself out.)
If I had my way OT was go from 5 to 7 minutes of 3 on 3 followed by the shutout.
Points would be
Two points for a regulation win
If a game goes to over time both teams still get a point.
But if goes to a shut out the loser gets 0 points and the winner only gets 1 point.
This would push teams to get the job done before going into a shutout.
So this proposed new rule is like a backcourt violation in basketball.
1:27 might want to be careful about that drawing board.
This would be one of the worst changes to ot if they went through with this
Love this rule. I think the NHL can learn from the NBA on the gray area since like you mentioned the rule is very similar and the NBA has had that rule for a long time. I don’t know if you need to asses a minor penalty. I think the faceoff in your defensive zone is sufficient.
Yes, Brodie I remember fondly 25 cent "phone booth" phone calls.
All OK. The puck cannot leave the Neutral Zone … gain possession, retreat up to YOUR Blue Line, turn around and attack.
Shoot outs gotta go. I was a fan but it really isn’t a fair way to end the game.
If you change the rules to stop recoils it'll only be a matter of time before the coaches figure out a new possession strategy… they always do.
Option 1) Get rid of the shootout and bring back ties. Teams intentionally kill time or wait for their one chance with possession knowing they'll get a crack at winning in the shootout still worst case scenario. If there's no shootout there's no motivation/reward for playing keep away for minutes on end, especially if you're a team that's great at picking up SOWs.
Option 2) If the shootout is kept, make a SOW worth less by adopting the 3 point system. You have to disincentivize to stop teams from strategizing this way. Period.
NHL is going further down the drain.
Let's complicate the game even more!….. Keep it simple and go back to tie games!
Not a fan of it keep the play going no face-offs
I am not a fan of the minor penalty for this. I agree with the D-zone faceoff.
The only issue is: missed passes
A pass was not completed and the puck goes past center into the D-Zone. That seems like it would be something that could be abused.
NHL NEEDS to adapt to the 4 pt standings system to can impact the overtime strategy if you will:
3 pts= win in regulation
2 pts= win in OT/SO
1 pt= lose in OT/SO
0 pts= loss in regulation
I think it is unnecessary to do this. Trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist, creates unnecessary whistles. To reduce shootouts, make OT 10 minutes.