I don’t think this has anything to do with reality…
OGHamToast
How in the world does Perbix have a higher projected rating than Vasilevskiy? Or Atkinson, Paul, Eyssimont, etc…
Credibility is suspect right outta the gate. Exactly what data are they using over there at datadrivenhockey?
C0gD1z
These ratings are obviously trash. McD at 59???? Sure he’s aging but that’s just disrespectful.
No-Doctor-4396
I stopped reading when I saw vasi was only 69 rating
toolschism
Okay did they just use RNG to generate these numbers? Seriously Cirelli and Atkinson same rating. Perbix in the 80s?! WHAT?!
Basil_Normal
Kinda silly to weight our goaltending as a straight average of Vasy and Johansson when Vasy is obviously going to carry a heavy load.
Interesting they have Atkinson projected so highly. If he (or Sheary) has a productive season, I’m bullish on our prospects. That’s the biggest hole in our lineup
6 Comments
I don’t think this has anything to do with reality…
How in the world does Perbix have a higher projected rating than Vasilevskiy? Or Atkinson, Paul, Eyssimont, etc…
Credibility is suspect right outta the gate. Exactly what data are they using over there at datadrivenhockey?
These ratings are obviously trash. McD at 59???? Sure he’s aging but that’s just disrespectful.
I stopped reading when I saw vasi was only 69 rating
Okay did they just use RNG to generate these numbers? Seriously Cirelli and Atkinson same rating. Perbix in the 80s?! WHAT?!
Kinda silly to weight our goaltending as a straight average of Vasy and Johansson when Vasy is obviously going to carry a heavy load.
Interesting they have Atkinson projected so highly. If he (or Sheary) has a productive season, I’m bullish on our prospects. That’s the biggest hole in our lineup