Mastodon
@Tampa Bay Lightning

Corey Perry’s Goal Called Back After Lengthy Review vs. Flames



Watch as Edmonton Oilers’ Corey Perry’s goal is called back after a coach’s challenge from the Calgary Flames and a lengthy review to the dismay of the Oilers bench.

———————————————-

đŸ“ș http://sportsnetplus.ca – Stream live on Sportsnet+
đŸ’» http://www.sportsnet.ca – More news & highlights on Sportsnet.ca

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhibwHk4WKw4leUt6JfRLg
https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet

https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/

@sportsnet

———————————————-

#NHL

00:00:00 –
00:00:57 – 1st Regulation Period

47 Comments

  1. Si je pouvais ĂȘtre aussi cool que le chat dans cette vidĂ©o, j'aurais plus d'abonnĂ©s que de blogueurs💋

  2. As a flames fan. This should’ve been a goal. Not complaining but I definitely disagree with this call. However that offside was correct though.

  3. That was called back?? What is wrong with it lol, I swear Goaltender interference just gets worse every year. My favorite is when a player is shoved into the goalie and the player that was shoved is called for a penalty

  4. COULD THE BIASED OFFICIATING AND BRIBERY GET ANY WORSE! That by NO MEANS was goalie interference! Rasmus Faggotson whacked Darth vlASSar with his stick, Perry simply tapped the puck in yet BETTMAN and his atrocious goons for refs screw Canada’s team over again! Cowtown thank the refs for bailing you out this by no means will be an honourable win for you

  5. Just put the Cowtown lames jersey on, refs everyone knows you rigged the match. Your monotonously terrible officiating says it all and won’t fool anyone. I wonder how BETTMAN even sleeps at night knowing his incompetent trash goons for refs are going around doing this bush league garbage. Not a good luck Gary! DISGRACE

  6. 3 penalties to the oilers 0, includes 2 called back goals lmao, certainly no bias going on here – apparently Calgary are playing like saints out there

  7. Thats the weakest goal called back in the history of the NHL … Holy F*** is the NHL getting pathetic.
    Until the fans boycott the NHL … this will never get fixed. Its not hitting their pocketbooks.

  8. Absolutely brutal call by Toronto. Refs call it a goal. How long do they need to give before a goalie is “good to go”?

  9. At least this video review to deny Corey Perry's goal took longer to make than the time the Chicsgo Blackhawk used in ditching him from the Windy City.

  10. How does the NHL keep allowing these Godawful calls to happen? As a Canucks fan, that’s prolly the worst call I’ve seen all year

  11. If we are going to decide games, goals by inches and waiste minutes deciding those calls we lost our game. But I guess people need jobs.

  12. What a weird Game?? Let's go upstairs 2 times and take 2 goals away from Oilers like it's the Stanley Cup play offs!! Lmao. I feel if you go upstairs and call in favor for 1 team you cant do it again in favor of the same team again. Whether or not what really happened. Both calls were iffy!! Flames need to take the reff out for a few wobbly pops for that one or give him a free flames Jersey. Also only 1 penalty called on the Flames. What did I just watch??

  13. Weird, feel that should have counted. I guess it didn’t matter though as would likely just be 4-2 F instead of 4-1 F

  14. All those saying it was a bad decision- tell me, what is the point of a goal crease?

  15. Everyone here that’s complaining obviously does not understand the rule book. This was goaltender interference. It was borderline but it did happen. (Btw please come and cry and complain you oilers that are going 0-3 including a game with the hawks đŸ€Ł)

  16. Lots of idiots arguing "it was 4-1 wouldn't have made a difference anyway. " So simple minded. 1 was an empty netter

    Both waived off goals were coaches challenge, if im not mistaken if u fail a challenge, u dont get another one. So if Toronto got the call right, Oilers would've been up 2-0, and been on a powerplay, plus Calgary wouldn't have been able to even challenge the offside that the refs missed. So thats 3-0, provided no goal on the powerplay.

  17. I uploaded the IIHF Rulebook to Chat gpt and asked the following question. "An attacking player deflects the puck while standing in front of the goalie inside the crease. it leads to a goal. the player did not have physical contact with the goalie. the player stood in direct line between defenseman who shot the puck and the goalie and net so that the goalie had to look around the player who deflected the puck. Is this a good goal?"

    Its response: "The goal in this scenario would not be allowed under IIHF rules. Even if there is no physical contact with the goalie, an attacking player cannot obstruct the goaltender’s ability to play their position. In this case, if the offensive player is standing in the crease and screening the goalie, preventing them from seeing or reacting to the shot, it constitutes interference. Since the player is obstructing the goalie’s vision from inside the crease, the goal would be disallowed. The exact rule that applies to this scenario in the IIHF rulebook is Rule 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper."

  18. This was goalie interference by the book/written rules. What is ridiculous is the NHL keeps changing its own criteria as this would have been a goal last and many previous seasons. You wrote the rule book, keep to it instead of improvising all the time.

Write A Comment