Mastodon
@Minnesota Wild

People are saying Ek skated into his elbow. I don’t know.. kinda looks like he over extends with the intention of making contact.



People are saying Ek skated into his elbow. I don’t know.. kinda looks like he over extends with the intention of making contact.

by HerbalAndy

8 Comments

  1. metalgoalie

    Larsson is playing the puck off the boards. His elbow incidentally hits him in the face. This is no different than an incidental high sticking penalty. It’s a painful missed call, but I don’t believe there was any malicious intent.

  2. SawdustIsMyCocaine

    It obviously wasn’t intentional, but it should have been called.

  3. HurricaneHomer9

    Probably should’ve been a penalty but he didn’t do it on purpose to Ek

  4. McPuckLuck

    Not a penalty. Same as a high stick on a follow through of a shot, not a penalty.

    His elbow is flared out because the boards are handcuffing his follow through. I think there is zero intent to hit Ek, it’s just unfortunate.

  5. wildwill57

    This is a split second judgement call by the referee and I don’t think anyone could argue if it had been called or not. Seems like most injuries happen with these types of is it a penalty or not plays.

  6. CanadaWildRyeBread

    It’s just a hockey play. Sucks for Ekker but it is what it is.

    My guess is he didn’t show any emotion either way…..

  7. shaman0610

    Yes, it was a missed penalty.

    No, there was not intent.

    I dare any of you saying it was intentional to practice digging a puck out from your feet from your backhand. Where the hell does YOUR elbow go?

Write A Comment