I won’t stand here and watch this Bwreezbwaah slander go unpunished
*Also this is pretty surprising: >Schenn dragged down everyone he played with this season, including Quinn Hughes. When Schenn and Hughes were on the ice together at 5-on-5, the Canucks had a 46.33% corsi. Do you know how hard it is to have a corsi below 50% while playing with Quinn Hughes?
NegativeNancyNuck
Myers was an A+ tank commander
dachshundie
Some of the grades seem pretty harsh. I understand that for consistency, one can argue that you need to compare to a standard frame of reference, but I think I’d much prefer a grading system that takes into account their role, salary, and expectations.
For example, I don’t find much utility in reading that a 7th D-man or 4th liner is a C to D based on the fact they didn’t put up 40 goals and be a showstopper. It feels terribly unfair to grade them based upon that expectation.
Many of the players in depth roles played just fine – Aman, Dries, Joshua, Burroughs, etc.
Aussie_Alien
Was Beauvillier ever partnered up with Miller during the season? I feel like he should have been in Di Giuseppe’s spot when he want with Petey.
ProtectionFromStupid
Tough but fair. Cant really argue with most of it. I do like the cautious optimism for next season though. A lot of youth that has the potential for breaking out.
This team is so close to .. something. A few right moves and they could be dangerous. A few wrong moves/injuries and they could be looking for new tank commanders.
Not sure Ive ever seen a team straddle that kind of line for so long
5 Comments
I won’t stand here and watch this Bwreezbwaah slander go unpunished
*Also this is pretty surprising:
>Schenn dragged down everyone he played with this season, including Quinn Hughes. When Schenn and Hughes were on the ice together at 5-on-5, the Canucks had a 46.33% corsi. Do you know how hard it is to have a corsi below 50% while playing with Quinn Hughes?
Myers was an A+ tank commander
Some of the grades seem pretty harsh. I understand that for consistency, one can argue that you need to compare to a standard frame of reference, but I think I’d much prefer a grading system that takes into account their role, salary, and expectations.
For example, I don’t find much utility in reading that a 7th D-man or 4th liner is a C to D based on the fact they didn’t put up 40 goals and be a showstopper. It feels terribly unfair to grade them based upon that expectation.
Many of the players in depth roles played just fine – Aman, Dries, Joshua, Burroughs, etc.
Was Beauvillier ever partnered up with Miller during the season?
I feel like he should have been in Di Giuseppe’s spot when he want with Petey.
Tough but fair. Cant really argue with most of it. I do like the cautious optimism for next season though. A lot of youth that has the potential for breaking out.
This team is so close to .. something. A few right moves and they could be dangerous. A few wrong moves/injuries and they could be looking for new tank commanders.
Not sure Ive ever seen a team straddle that kind of line for so long