1) Parayko – 4 full sized orange cones, 1 bag new pucks.
2) Krug – A kiddie pool, bag of used pucks
3) Leddy – A white sheet, a stick, pair of skates
4) Scandella – A gatorade cooler, rip fuel, used smelling salt
scrivensB
The weird part is if Parayko wasn’t the defacto #1, things would be quite a bit different.
If he could be the complimentary top pairing guy with a true #1, the whole facr of the D changes. Leddy on Colt’s left side really doesn’t make a lot of sense. I have to assume Doug’s paln was the Colt was that #1 guy and Krug woulf then be his compliment. But it didn’t pan out.
The other glaring issue is that Faulk and Krug play more of less the same role. But they are also 2nd pairing guys. Putting Krug on the third pairing and each of them then having a solid defensive partner would be fine. But Rosen and Krug don’t really make a lot of sense together.
I would hesitate to move Colt. His deal is not nearly as bad as people thing it is. And this D minus Colt… oh, sweet baby Jesus, we might as well play all AHL guys and Faulk at that point.
Moving him means you no only need to top pairing LD, but also a RD now.
The only silver linign to moving Colt is he may well bring in a good return. But if there aren’t TWO legit top pair D-men out there to sign/trade for, what good is that return.
callmepaulwall
I want to see more of Calle Rosen tbh. He’s got lots of potential, but I get not wanting to waste it until be have a more stable Defensive D Core.
3 Comments
1) Parayko – 4 full sized orange cones, 1 bag new pucks.
2) Krug – A kiddie pool, bag of used pucks
3) Leddy – A white sheet, a stick, pair of skates
4) Scandella – A gatorade cooler, rip fuel, used smelling salt
The weird part is if Parayko wasn’t the defacto #1, things would be quite a bit different.
If he could be the complimentary top pairing guy with a true #1, the whole facr of the D changes. Leddy on Colt’s left side really doesn’t make a lot of sense. I have to assume Doug’s paln was the Colt was that #1 guy and Krug woulf then be his compliment. But it didn’t pan out.
The other glaring issue is that Faulk and Krug play more of less the same role. But they are also 2nd pairing guys. Putting Krug on the third pairing and each of them then having a solid defensive partner would be fine. But Rosen and Krug don’t really make a lot of sense together.
I would hesitate to move Colt. His deal is not nearly as bad as people thing it is. And this D minus Colt… oh, sweet baby Jesus, we might as well play all AHL guys and Faulk at that point.
Moving him means you no only need to top pairing LD, but also a RD now.
The only silver linign to moving Colt is he may well bring in a good return. But if there aren’t TWO legit top pair D-men out there to sign/trade for, what good is that return.
I want to see more of Calle Rosen tbh. He’s got lots of potential, but I get not wanting to waste it until be have a more stable Defensive D Core.