Mastodon
@Calgary Flames

‘It’s Going To Be Talked About For A While’ Blake Coleman Dives Deep On Game 5 Disallowed Goal



Calgary Flames centre Blake Coleman speaks on the now-infamous non-goal in Game 5 of their series against the Edmonton Oilers, explaining his view of the play and his thoughts on the rule that caused his go-ahead goal to be waved off.

23 Comments

  1. Flames getting dominated for 4 straight games will be talked about for years especially in a BoA. Flames trying to spin the narrative instead of answering why there stars and defence didn't come to play. Dominance not a kick should be the highlight of this series. I love how hes laughing like the Flames deserved to win the series and the kick was why they didint. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍👍

  2. damn getting dummied for 4/5 games and "the kick wasn't a kick" is the defence? Pathetic

  3. Please stop talking about that No goal and ask what happened to the Flames in game 2,3,4 ? Where was there offense players ?

  4. Stop talking about the no goal. Team was up 5-1 in the first game and let oilers tie it up and almost blew it. Game two up 3-1 then blew it. Game five up 2-0 then blew it. If it was a game 7 then ya okay but come on they were done for way before that BS call was made. It's a crutch people are using for a series that was lost way before that point.

  5. his left leg goes accross his right leg is not a natural move, and the little flick at the end was clear it was intentional period.

  6. lmao the fact the you are so confident that goal would've won the game says everything you need to know about this team. you blew leads all series, oilers could've easily tied the game with over 6 minutes. it wasn't overtime. just trying to avoid talking about getting worked for 4 games straight.

  7. Ya at this point who cares, it was called a distinct kicking motion if you believe it was or not, obviously there was more then just that reason to why the seasons over for them. The better team moves on

  8. Man, they're just gonna hold on to it forever, hey? Gotta have that excuse handy while you hope everyone forgets how you got your asses beat in the series.

  9. Edm fans have every right to be annoyed that some are pretending this decided the series when it’s a best of 7 that ended in 5.

    That said, I really do hope they change the rule a bit to make it more concrete on what is a goal and what is not. As it is written now, the rule is simply to arbitrary to enforce in a consistent manner

  10. Even if the goal is counted as legitimate, does not guarantee a Flames win because the game was not over. We can talk about this controversial goal all our lives but there are so many "ifs" to consider in the series. The primary reason there are 7 games in a playoff series is to factor in human errors, if any. Lesson learned, exert more effort next year.

  11. Let's be honest here, if Coleman's goal didn't get overturned, and the flames won game 5, the Oilers would've beat them in game 6. Either way, Flames lose.

  12. Both sides have a bit of a case but the league thought he directed it in with a skate on purpose so that's the way it goes. I see the point you don't want a bunch of goals start getting "deflected" in by skates. Remove the rule entirely and it puts the game back to the players instead of the refs at least.

  13. You could clear it up though… plus I like that you mentioned that the series wasn’t decided on only that goal

Write A Comment