Our debate segment returns, as Matt and Blake debate whether the Canucks should draft for positional need with the 11th overall pick in the NHL Draft, or if they should target the best player available, regardless of position.
***VOTE IN THE COMMENTS BY SELECTING THE THUMB’S UP BUTTON”
Presented by Yellow Dog Brewing (https://lnk.to/YDBrewing)
Listen & subscribe to the podcast: https://lnk.to/SP585
Text us your feedback: 778-402-9680
🔗: https://linktr.ee/SekeresAndPrice
https://www.sekeresandprice.com/
https://www.rinkwidevancouver.com
#Canucks #VancouverCanucks #NHL #Hockey #Vancouver #NHLDraft
18 Comments
Trade 11 round pick with bad contract for a center or dman
First rd pick 11
Best player available 👌
BPA
Trade 11 for detroits 3 2nd round pics in a row
Take the best Dman available at 11
Use 11th pick for the most talented player available. Dont trade it away.
Give this a thumb's up if you think Matt Sekeres (best player available) won the debate!
Give this a thumb's up if you think Blake Price (positional need) won the debate!
RD…..a d, that can be a good bet as top 4. Like #1 centre, you pay enormous on ufa, or trade for top 4 RD. Reinbacker, Willander, ASP in that order. Perhaps Semishev although a LD.
In this years draft position needed up into maybe 15 pick then the best player available after that.
This may be the toughest SvsP yet! Very good arguments!
Look wat happened when they drafted for position when they passed on tkachuk
We still have 2 3rd round pick and 3 4th round pick right? After draft the best player in 11th pick, we can draft 5 d man next if they want 😂
mr. sekeres wins for me.
To Blake, slightly irrelevant but the time is always now 😉. To Matt, I've got reasonable doubt that at eleven there will not be more than one option for best (subjective) draft pick that can/will compliment our current deficiencies. Without any overtime we have a tie imho.
I think both arguments are good
"Oh God that was good" 😂😂😂 too funny