Mastodon
@Pittsburgh Penguins

Penguins Jesus with an off-season thought, is there anyone in Penguins history (besides the obvious) who had/have a case to get their number in the rafters? Secondly, should the Pens start a “ring-of-honor” for players who maybe don’t have the accolades for number retirement?



Penguins Jesus with an off-season thought, is there anyone in Penguins history (besides the obvious) who had/have a case to get their number in the rafters? Secondly, should the Pens start a “ring-of-honor” for players who maybe don’t have the accolades for number retirement?

by HortonTheHierophant

32 Comments

  1. Cheeks_Klapanen

    Well the three (or potentially 4, depending on how you feel about Letang) next most likely candidates are all still playing, so no I don’t think it’s that odd.

    (In reference to the original Penguins Jesus tweet)

  2. sausagepizzabaker

    66, 68, 87, 71, and 58 are slam dunk retired numbers. I am not as high on MAF as most, I think he’s closer to Chris Osgood than one of the all time greats, but he probably gets retired eventually but shouldn’t be alongside the core 3. After that you can maybe do a ring of honor like it suggests. Like Kunitz, Guentzel, and Gonchar would all be fits in that tier.

  3. idontwannatalk2u

    Number retirement should only be for the best of the best of the best. Only the franchise cornerstones.

    A ring of honor would be nice to honor those other important contributors.

  4. jawnquixote

    No, what’s odd are these franchises retiring the numbers of good but not great players because they need something for positive publicity. There’s no reason for Kipper to be getting retired by the Flames but their optics are at an all-time low so they are going to retire his number.

    The Penguins do it exactly right. When it’s all said and done, in the next decade we will see 68, 87, 71, and 58 for sure joining the rafters, and possibly 29. That’s more than enough.

    I’m down for a ring of honor though.

  5. Euphoric__Dot

    Barrasso is strange one now, he’s going into the HoF but hasn’t had his jersey retired by the Pens

  6. _stoned_chipmunk_

    Ron Francis immediately came to mind

  7. Gillkid615

    We absolutely should have a ring of honor. Kessel, Rust, Guentzel, Gonchar, Hagelin, and those types. Winning back to back cups is a huge deal and the major players from 09 and the back to back should be honored further

  8. Apollo_T_Yorp

    Hot take: I’m throwing Talbot in the ring of honor. Does the 09 Cup happen without him?

  9. jbeachley18

    The Penguins do have a Ring of Honor/Hall of Fame, it’s just not displayed in the seating area like it was at the Igloo.

  10. therealrocketboy

    The ring-of-honor is a job within the Penguins broadcast team.

  11. Wizemonk

    here is our Rafters: Lemieux, Jagr, Francis, Recchi, then eventually Crosby, Malkin, Letang, Fluerry

  12. FireBreathers

    I’d agrue Pascal Dupuis not for jersey retirement but for the ring of honor, might be a bit of a reach for some but he had a hell of a career in Pittsburgh

  13. Supervisor3000

    I always chuckle when I see all the numbers the Blues have retired (having come into the league at the same time as the Pens). They have also had far less success (Cups). If the Pens operated like the Blues did, they’d have about 20 numbers retired at this point.

  14. nstueber88

    I thought that anyway had a ring of honor?

  15. TheWasabinator

    I would have a hard time putting up Jagr’s jersey without putting up Fleury’s. Jagr finished #2 in the NHL all time scoring with the majority of the points coming as a Penguins player. With 7 more wins Fleury passes up Patrick Roy and will finish #2 in most wins ever by a goalie. Most of those wins coming as a Penguins player.

    IMO both 68 and 29 should be up in the rafters, seriously two of the best players ever in the NHL.

    My rafters: 66 68 87 71 29 and 21 Damn impressive group of players!

  16. xShadyMcGradyx

    Kunitz and Francis ezpz.

    Its wierd to say but Jake Guentzal may already qualify too

  17. Not for number retirement but Ring of Honor

    Straka,
    Stevens ,
    Recchi
    Ulf
    Errey
    Ray Bourque…no wait I mean Phil
    Coffey

    Alex Stojanov

    Francis
    Barrasso
    Talbot

    Retired numbers
    66, 68, 71, 87, 58, 29

    Edit… most are already in roh

  18. BananaShortcomings

    87, 71, 68.

    Letang may be a nice guy and has good hair and skates well but he’s never won any major awards. He’s never led the team in points. He just passes the puck to Sid or Geno who set up a goal. He’s not HOF worthy so he shouldn’t get his jersey retired. Put him in the ring of honor and leave it be

  19. beano919

    Sid, Geno, Francis, Jagr, Letang, maybe Fleury.

  20. crashrizzo

    66, 68, 87 and 21. That’s it, that’s all. You don’t want to turn into the Canadiens whose retired every number and now the current players wear high numbers or the Coyotes who retired Shane Friggin’ Doan

  21. Latter-Score-8937

    A Ring of Honor would be great to see for guys like Talbot, Hornqvist, Kessel, Barrasso, Stevens, etc…

  22. dave6687

    68 should go up when he retires, and when Sid retires, 87, 71, 29, and 58 should go up together. 71 and 58 drive me crazy but you have to hand it to them for what they accomplished with the team. I really can’t imagine anyone else wearing those numbers. You could make the argument for 10 but he played twice as many games for HAR/CAR, so I feel like he’s an almost. I also wouldn’t mind if 29 and 58 didn’t get it.

  23. mooncakeandgary

    To your second point, no “ring of honor”. That turns into honoring too many players over the course of time, which makes the honor meaningless.

Write A Comment