Can the Vancouver Canucks beat Connor McDavid and the Edmonton Oilers one day in the playoffs? Matt arguers no, the Canucks won’t be able to. Blake says yes, the Canucks can beat the Oilers. Remember, vote in the comments on who you think made the more compelling argument!
Presented by @LiUNALocal (https://lnk.to/SPLiuna1611)
Listen & subscribe to the podcast: https://lnk.to/SP613
Text us your feedback: 778-402-9680
đź”—: https://linktr.ee/SekeresAndPrice
https://www.sekeresandprice.com/
https://www.rinkwidevancouver.com
#Canucks #VancouverCanucks #NHL #Hockey #Vancouver
10 Comments
Give a thumb's up if you think Blake Price won the debate (yes, the Canucks can beat McDavid & the Oilers)
Give a thumb's up if you think Matt Sekeres won the debate (no, the Canucks won't beat McDavid & the Oilers)
Love seeing you guys on YouTube!
Will the Canucks first line ever be better than the Oilers first line while McDavid and Draisaitl are there? Unlikely. But depth wins playoffs, and in a few years we might have them beat in that regard.
Blake won!
Oilers shouldn’t have lost to Vegas. Skinner was a weird choice.
What concrete evidence does Matt Sekeres have for the assertion that the Canucks are a "poorly run organisation"? Have Rutherford and Allvin committed so many faux pas in the last two years that they're indisputably worse than about 30 other regimes around the league? I seriously doubt that, but the statement would in any case imply some sort of a ranking, a mental index. It would run from "brilliant" through "good", "normal" or a lot of "mediocre" before finally reaching "poor". Seriously, in two years? In any case, while Jim Benning has well and truly been discredited, his associates still get invited on. Which is fine, but can elicit bemusement.
Bubble Demko …. activate!
Blake won
Voting for Matt.