Jordan Staal scoring in a penalty shot against Columbus 10-21-06. Despite the ref washout, it was ruled a goal upon review because it went in on rebound from the goalie’s back.
Watch closely at the end. It goes off the goalie's back and goes in, which is a valid goal. As long as the shooter only makes one shot, anything that happens after that counts.
That is not the rule. As was eventually decided on review, it was a goal. As long as the player doesn't touch it after making the initial shot, any momentum/change in direction of the puck is valid.
20 Comments
they wave it off wtf???
Uh… he didn't score. Looks like post.
Watch closely at the end. It goes off the goalie's back and goes in, which is a valid goal. As long as the shooter only makes one shot, anything that happens after that counts.
That is not the rule. As was eventually decided on review, it was a goal. As long as the player doesn't touch it after making the initial shot, any momentum/change in direction of the puck is valid.
yo the goal counted because it went into the net without Staal rebounding it but it went off the goalie
yer right
nice seats
no, the player has to continue his forward momentum
Random much?
wasnt that shorthanded too?
Actually you're right. He had *2* SHG that game. This one, and another.
14:43 SHG – Jordan Staal, Wrist Shot – Assists: Mark Recchi and Rob Scuderi
07:49 SHG – Jordan Staal, Wrist Shot – Assists: none
ok…7 sh goals in his first season and 0 in his second..always at the same level! š
rangers suck
And the video goal judge said "GOAL!"
GOAL
Did the puck go in the net? Yes.
Did he touch the puck after taking the initial shot? No.
Those are the 2 requirements for a good goal. So yes, it is a goal.
if you watch it the puck goes in after it hits the post
0:16 , it bounced on the goalies' back. That's the goal
@KarnivalKings it goes in after it hits the post.. from the back of the goalie.
hits the post
hits the goalie
goes INTO the net…
its a goal.