Shooting while falling then immediately getting up is embellishment? Interesting.
Thisishowwejewitt
Refs should be disciplined for calls that bad.
wankonobie
Absolute dog shit of a call lol
Olipod2002
Gosh that was call was so bad
leaponover
They need to change the rule. If a penalty is ruled to have been embellished by the fouled player, then the referee can allow play to continue rather than penalize both players. There can be a gesture for it to show the referee saw a penalty but ruled embellishment.
WookieSuave
I hadn’t seen that before. Thats embarrassing.
someguyfromsk
His goal counted on June 6 2022, so that makes up for it.
goompa88
This might be the worst call I’ve ever seen and I’m not joking
Like17Badgers
I hate this… cause it’s “correct” and why I hate hockey’s Embellishment rules.
before the goal there’s no call for a hook(at least from a ref on screen, might have been an Advantage from one off screen?) if it’s a played advantage the penalty would be declined, but because of how embellishment works they aren’t allowed to decline a penalty they didn’t want.
people joke about how Goaltender Interference makes no sense, but hockey’s embellishment rules are WAAAY dumber
onlysmallcats
Jesus. Even Leafs fans can agree that’s a terrible call.
steboy
C’mon, Arturirious?
Fastsmitty47
Gotta be the worst embellishment call of all time. Normally they call the embellishment along with the initial “penalty”. This being one of the rare time they only call the dive makes it even more crazy.
Ok-Collection3729
The only embellishment was the call
Mandeko
I remember that game, the crowd was so mad it was crazy.
16 Comments
That’s one of the worst calls I have ever seen.
Shooting while falling then immediately getting up is embellishment? Interesting.
Refs should be disciplined for calls that bad.
Absolute dog shit of a call lol
Gosh that was call was so bad
They need to change the rule. If a penalty is ruled to have been embellished by the fouled player, then the referee can allow play to continue rather than penalize both players. There can be a gesture for it to show the referee saw a penalty but ruled embellishment.
I hadn’t seen that before. Thats embarrassing.
His goal counted on June 6 2022, so that makes up for it.
This might be the worst call I’ve ever seen and I’m not joking
I hate this… cause it’s “correct” and why I hate hockey’s Embellishment rules.
before the goal there’s no call for a hook(at least from a ref on screen, might have been an Advantage from one off screen?) if it’s a played advantage the penalty would be declined, but because of how embellishment works they aren’t allowed to decline a penalty they didn’t want.
people joke about how Goaltender Interference makes no sense, but hockey’s embellishment rules are WAAAY dumber
Jesus. Even Leafs fans can agree that’s a terrible call.
C’mon, Arturirious?
Gotta be the worst embellishment call of all time. Normally they call the embellishment along with the initial “penalty”. This being one of the rare time they only call the dive makes it even more crazy.
The only embellishment was the call
I remember that game, the crowd was so mad it was crazy.
That was clear embellishment guys, y’all blind