Mastodon
@San Jose Sharks

NHL Officials Discuss Whether Logan Couture Was Offside Before Penalty Shot



Watch as NHL officials discuss whether Logan Couture was offside before taking his penalty shot.
———————————————-

Subscribe to Sportsnet on YouTube – http://sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L

Visit Sportsnet.ca for more sports news and highlights – http://www.sportsnet.ca
Follow Sportsnet on Facebook – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTFB
Follow Sportsnet on Twitter – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR
Follow Sportsnet on Instagram – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTINST
Follow Sportsnet on Snapchat – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP
Watch Sportsnet on Sportsnet Now – http://sportsnet.ca/now

42 Comments

  1. Good non-offsides call. Logan Couture had control of the puck before his right skate was completely in the attacking zone.

  2. I don’t care even if he was 10 feet offsides, If it’s against the wild then I’m glad it counts as a goal

  3. Take away the point then. Sharks will still go on great. Minnesota Wild is no competition and they still won. Bad post

  4. Doesn't look like he had control, would've been interesting to see what the call would've been if they had any reason to look at it.

  5. I just happened to turn the TV on last night right before this happened and after the penetly shot went in and the refs we're reviewing it you could hear every time they were showing the reply on the jumbotron… You could just here the fans boooooooooing then a break then they would show it again and the fans would boooooo. Kind of funny 😂

  6. I’m a sharks fan and I thought that was offsides. It was an incredibly weird situation. Like if he scored then they would have gotten the challenge but because the penalty shot it’s unchallengeable. I can see a revision of the rule coming next year.

  7. Stupid. If was offside earlier refs would have called it…. but they didn't so move on. This video review is Bush league

  8. Whether he was offside or not, him being offside shouldn't have disallowed the goal, it didn't directly lead to a goal and they didn't review it before the penalty shot.

  9. Ok it should be challenged because the penalty shot was a continuation of the play which started from an off sides

  10. Hes playing in the best league in the world. To think he would not have possession of the puck is like thinking a championship bowler got a "Lucky Strike"

  11. The thumbnail makes it look like the officials were discussing offside on the penalty shot itself

  12. Logan had control only because he was offside. If his feet were behind the puck, it would be onside with no control. He would of had fallen down. Puck has to cross the line first then feet. Clear as day

  13. Seriously its 2019, we have cameras that can read the serial numbers off of paper money from 50ft away and communicate with the entire world but having enough cameras and personnel on hand to be able to make calls on a game in real time is beyond us!?

  14. I have a quick reasoning why it stands. Back in Nashville in 2017 there was a delayed penalty, the other team scored, however it was called back due to offsides. The penalty still was called tho, and it’s the same as this

Write A Comment