Someone in The Athletic headline writing department needs a lesson in the Chelios family history, then the word “nepotism”, then a timeout to be ashamed of themselves.
Three_Froggy_Problem
Regardless of whether she’s benefitted from nepotism (obviously she has) I think she’s a good broadcaster and I’m glad she’s doing it. There should be more women doing play-by-play and panel analysis in the NHL.
Real-Competition-187
She’s half decent as an analyst, but her monotone voice kills me.
Hutch25
She’s really knowledgeable at hockey which sadly isn’t a skill most of the broadcaster in the league have.
She’s also really smooth on the mic. The chemistry between her and Vosters is really good.
IdyllicOleander
In this world it isn’t what you know, it’s **who** you know.
Always_Sunny_In_Chi
I’m sorry I’m sure she’s a nice person and all but going from Pat and Eddie to CV and Caley… that’s an insane downfall of our broadcast booth. Just glad we have Panger I guess
6 Comments
Someone in The Athletic headline writing department needs a lesson in the Chelios family history, then the word “nepotism”, then a timeout to be ashamed of themselves.
Regardless of whether she’s benefitted from nepotism (obviously she has) I think she’s a good broadcaster and I’m glad she’s doing it. There should be more women doing play-by-play and panel analysis in the NHL.
She’s half decent as an analyst, but her monotone voice kills me.
She’s really knowledgeable at hockey which sadly isn’t a skill most of the broadcaster in the league have.
She’s also really smooth on the mic. The chemistry between her and Vosters is really good.
In this world it isn’t what you know, it’s **who** you know.
I’m sorry I’m sure she’s a nice person and all but going from Pat and Eddie to CV and Caley… that’s an insane downfall of our broadcast booth. Just glad we have Panger I guess