Will Cuylle thought he’d scored a goal. After a loooooong review it was deemed the original shot was covered and the play was dead so there was ruled to be no goal. What do you think? Have your say!
No goal. Ref can use the i meant to blow it earlier excuse. There’s no evidence the puck crossed the line before that action. Can’t use the puck after the goalie moves to determine it, can’t guess either. No goal.
even cameras can´t do ….i think its about time they put chip inside the puck something like VAR in soccer works these days but only goals because judgind offsides could be mess
7 Comments
how tf is this not a goal
Ref said "play was frozen", yet he didn't blow the whistle until Kakko shoved the pads. Just a weird call, especially after that 10-15 minute review
shouldve been a goal, but even with the no goal call rangers still won in shootout, haha cbj losers
No goal. Ref can use the i meant to blow it earlier excuse. There’s no evidence the puck crossed the line before that action. Can’t use the puck after the goalie moves to determine it, can’t guess either. No goal.
even cameras can´t do ….i think its about time they put chip inside the puck something like VAR in soccer works these days but only goals because judgind offsides could be mess
The refs suked last night.
How the fuck wasn't that given as a goal… Holy shit the NHL refs manage to surprise every year