Mastodon
@Carolina Hurricanes

Canucks don’t NEED Ethan Bear



Become a RevTrev member to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXAT6T7qTyy7I1gRRTuHwWQ/join

To follow me on:
X (Twitter) https://twitter.com/KempnerCanucks
Facebook: Search Kempner Canucks
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@kempnercanucks

Thanks for watching Kempner Canucks! If you want passionate, realistic & honest Canuck content hit the Like & Subscribe button. Thanks for your support.
Music:
Getaway – Powder [YouTube Audio]

24 Comments

  1. He was a free asset. Allvin, would have love to use Bear as a trade chip for his future dealings to upgrade the team.

  2. trades is like drama who won the trade ? debait about good and bad things about the players involved ? acorse gossip ? fans crave carnage aka hockey fights ufc and for the kids who are not old enough to know the differance between real & fake wwe

  3. Definitely agree. Last nights game showed that they don’t need to make a panic move. Plus Bear want more with a term than Canucks can do right now.
    No Rush!!!
    I am good with that!

  4. i personally dont care if he signs or not but Juulsen is where he would have played now if it was Juulsen from a month and a half ago yes I would definitely play Bear over Juulsen but with how much Juulsen is improving his game lately I would not

  5. What we will NEED in the next couple years is Podkolzin, Lekkerimäki and especially Willander to be a factor. Having those players be impactful for on the cheap is pinnacle for total team success. IF we can replace Myers (~$6M) with Willander and Garland (~$4M) with Lekkerimäki then we’re laughing. You then take that bank and bolster your blue line..the rest goes in net to honour a Demko extension. That whole formula is the hope and beauty of draft picks turning out. Otherwise, it’s the massive over-pay in free-agency, and quite frankly I’m sick and tired of that game

  6. I like the fact he may have come at a discount off an injury. But yeah like you said maybe a 5-7 depth defenseman. We can get that elsewhere.

  7. I agree, he'd be nice for depth but we are winning with what we have.

    The only way I want to see us add a defenceman right now is if the new guy comes in and is immediately and clearly, our #3 best d-man. That means he must be better than Soucy, Zadorov and Cole. To get a guy like that it would take dealing a winger with some salary like Kuzmenko or Garland but either seriously depletes our winger talent.

  8. Some of these great look D man should be swappable ie when suscy comes back send him to AHL to get beefed up as well as BEAR AND THEN ROTATE ACCORDLY HAVE THE 7TH JUST IN CASE 1 GETS INJURED OR SOMETHING. i do this will all my nhl gm trades 🙂

  9. Yes you did. You just mad mad he chose to go somewhere else.
    He's good so don't just say he sux bc you hate.

  10. I have no issue with this. He is a depth defenseman and whoever pays for him to be more will regret it. On top of this he is coming off a significant injury. Personally I think the Canucks may have dodged a bullet!

Write A Comment