Mastodon
@Calgary Flames

Flames’ Andrew Mangiapane Credited With Goal After Lengthy Review vs. Maple Leafs



Watch as Calgary Flames forward Andrew Mangiapane gets credited with a goal after it was determined during a review that the puck went in off a Toronto Maple Leafs player’s stick.

———————————————-

Subscribe to Sportsnet on YouTube – http://sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L

Visit Sportsnet.ca for more sports news and highlights – http://www.sportsnet.ca
Follow Sportsnet on Facebook – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTFB
Follow Sportsnet on Twitter – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR
Follow Sportsnet on Instagram – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTINST
Follow Sportsnet on Snapchat – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP
Follow Sportsnet on TikTok – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTIKTOK
Watch Sportsnet on Sportsnet Now – http://sportsnet.ca/now

———————————————-

Sportsnet is Canada’s #1 Sports Network. Your home for the latest highlights, breaking sports news, in-depth athlete interviews, cutting edge podcasts, live streams and much more. Don’t miss a single highlight reel goal, huge home run, exceptional dunk or mind blowing touchdown. Get inside scoops and industry leading insights with unparalleled access. Get to know a different side of your favourite sports superstars in one of a kind, offbeat comedic interviews. Sportsnet is the one stop shop for the fan inside all of us.

———————————————-

17 Comments

  1. BWAHAHAHA if tranna canā€™t seriously beat Cowtown and we dismantle and beat the living crap out of Cowtown then every player on the Queefs should demand a trade and rebuild. Imagine this living joke of a cup contender losing to the fLames? McJesus and the oilers could NEVER

  2. Edit: Never mind I was wrong, I didn't see the rule 49.2 (ii) that says a deflection off a stick is a good goal, I was only looking at rule 37.4 which doesn't clarify that point.

    This should not have been a goal, according to the rules a deflection off a player after a kick is NOT a goal and that's what the ref's announced – it deflected off Lilygren's stick so it was a "good goal"… a deflection is not possession and only possession could negate the kick unless they decided his distinct kicking motion wasn't a kick so these refs made up their own rules or announced the wrong reason, either way they were wrong.

  3. FIRE KEEFE FIRE KEEFE TIMES UP TIMES UP TIMES UP TIMES UP FIRE KEEFE NOW SHANAHAN GOTTA TO GO TOO FIRE THEM NOW!!!! BESIDES THE COACH LOSES US GAMES, GOALTENDING ATROCIOUS!!! FIRE THEM NOW!!!

  4. I don't understand why can't you kick the puck in? If the NHL wants more offense and increase scoring than scoring goals either by stick, by hand or by foot should count. Also get rid of the offside rule as well.

  5. The Toronto defenseman touched it after the kick. It was then pushed in while on the line by the flames players. This is absolutely a good goal, no discression whatsoever.

  6. He kicked it with his left skate and the puck defected off his right skate, that wasnā€™t a kicking motion, good goal as it was deflected in.

  7. that's not a kick first of all, just a double deflection off both skates. even if it had been kicked, toronto touches it before it crosses the line. good goal either way

Write A Comment