Mastodon
@New York Rangers

Rangers’ Trade Odyssey: Tarasenko, Chychrun, Vatrano, and the Unfolding Deadline Drama



Rangers’ Trade Odyssey: Tarasenko, Chychrun, Vatrano, and the Unfolding Deadline Drama

by raytadd

7 Comments

  1. jaypeedee1025

    Just ridding us of Goodrows contract alone the Anaheim deal is the one to make

  2. The priority is to get goodrow the fuck out, idc if we trade add a prospect that we have no intention of using (in this case robertson) to banish him to chicago or wherever else his dumbass nmc allows him to go

  3. GnomeToTheDome

    Let’s get back Tarasenko! He was nice last year at the end of the season and blended in well.

  4. So let me see if I can get this straight: we essentially need a Center and a RW. This article has us trading two young assets (Kakko and Key) for older players needing longer deals in Tarasenko and Chychrun. After which… we’d still need a center and a RW.

    Then we’d somehow trade Goodrow (Our current shutdown line Center, contract aside) plus a pick (and prospects?) for an expiring 3C and a RW.

    So (if this article is to be believed) we slot Tarasenko with Zib and Krieds, play Chych in Key’s place, put Henrique as 3C with Vatrano and Culye… and then who plays 4C/shutdown? Bring Bonino back? Do we fire Blake Wheeler into the sun?

    This sounds like fanfic or some late night video game maneuvering.

  5. -RainWhenIDie-

    I don’t understand why people think Vatrano is available for anything other than a ridiculous overpayment. The Ducks have zero reason to trade him for anything less than that. He’s not coming back.

  6. L_viathan

    Jesus fucking christ why do we insist on bringing the same people back every single year?

Write A Comment