Mastodon
@Florida Panthers

Did Bruins get robbed? 😤 + Playoff Player Power Rankings 🚀 | The Drop



Welcome back to the Drop! Arda Öcal and Greg Wyshynski are back in studio to deliver you the latest news across the NHL! First we start out with the winners and losers of the weekend! We start out with Greg’s interaction with Florida Panthers Head Coach Paul Maurice postgame. Then we dive deep into all the drama from the weekend games! Should Sam Bennett have been suspended? Should Bennett’s goal have been called back? Please let us know in the comments what you think on all the controversies from these games! Next we power rank the best performances of the playoffs! Who will take the top spot? We also deliver the 3 biggest disappointments of the playoffs! All that and more on this episode of The Drop!

00:00 Cold Open: Paul Maurice and Greg Wyshynski back and forth
00:29 Welcome to The Drop!
2:29 Winner: PWHL
3:27 Loser: Bruins VS. Florida and the NHL
11:21 Connor McDavid cross-checked Controversy
14:41 Winner: Jake Oettinger and Arturs Silovs
15:59 Edmonton’s goaltending situation
17:08 Rangers VS. Hurricanes series
19:03 Winner: Sergei Bobrovsky
21:15 Top 10 Playoff Players
26:14 Connor McDavid not best player in playoffs
27:00 Do the NY Rangers have the best player in the playoffs?
29:50 Top 10 List
29:57 3 biggest playoff disappointments
33:43 Thank you for watching!

✔️ Subscribe to ESPN+ https://plus.espn.com/
✔️ Get the ESPN App: http://www.espn.com/espn/apps/espn
✔️ Subscribe to ESPN on YouTube: http://es.pn/SUBSCRIBEtoYOUTUBE
✔️Subscribe to ESPN FC on YouTube: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoESPNFC
✔️Subscribe to NBA on ESPN on YouTube: http://bit.ly/SUBSCRIBEtoNBAonESPN
✔️Watch ESPN on YouTube TV: http://es.pn/YouTubeTV

#nhl #espn

20 Comments

  1. The Bruins and their fans should be on their knees, kissing the feet of the NHL executives for giving them a way to deflect away the fact that they are being badly beaten.

  2. Ya, iffy reffing, but if a team can't muster more than 3 shots in 20 minutes, then too bad so sad.

    Also, wonder if there'd be so much whining if the B's had won?
    Ya want some cheese with that wine?? 🤤

  3. The call by the replay officials was correct whether you like it or not. It's the rule that everyone has a problem with. It wasn't a Panther player that interfered with the goalie. The crosscheck took place outside of the goalie area and it wasn't called. It was a Bruin player that interfered and that makes all the difference. Replay rules don't allow a penalty to be called unless it was involved with goalie interference. It makes no difference if the crosscheck took place right next to the goalie area or at center ice.

  4. Bruins Robbed? TORONTO MADE THE CALL! They were outshot and out played! QUIT BELLY ACHING! Boston STILL HAS A CHANCE OR DO THEY?
    START PRACTICING THE EXCUSES!

  5. For Bennett to say he doesn’t have time to pre-meditate punch in that situation is absolutely Rediculous. It’s called timing.

    Martial artists and fighters practice landing quick punches when closing in on an opponent. It’s very easy to practice. Especially when an opponent is not expecting a punch at all. This is just as silly as these refs thinking there was no goalie interference.

  6. As a lifelong pro wrestling fan I enjoyed your comparisons! Very accurate. Guerrero would be proud of Bennett in this series for sure

  7. Not a Boston or Florida fan for the record. The officials have been horrible this year. This is not acceptable in a major league sport. The NHL officials are completely unaccountable. This is not acceptable. And to continue to blow calls this badly in the playoffs is egregious. Regardless of the GI rule, how does that cross check get missed? You have two referees on the ice including one a couple feet from the player committing the cross check. What is that ref looking at?!? Officiating this poor undermines the credibility of the sport.

  8. Purely under rule 69.3 goal would have been overturned. But the clause 69.7 makes it a good goal. These 2 keep repeating 69.3. But fails to mention the clause in 69.7.

Write A Comment