> When scoring the responses from each venue, FSO said the following was considered:
> Novel technologies that improve and enhance the gameday experience
> New approaches to simplifying and speeding up the merchandise and concessions process
>Exciting and engaging menu items
>Efficient ingress, egress and wayfinding
>Facilitated transportation
>Easy access to wireless connectivity
>Physical and cybersecurity
>Mixed-use development opportunities
>Venue design features
…which explains why we would all disagree…
busterdad
Exciting and engaging chicken tenders as far as the eye can see.
Team store featuring a Dazzling array of the same three jerseys for three years straight.
Woo!
brokowska420
Going to Citi field this weekend and I don’t care if the Mets win or lose, the stadium experience is so worth the trip. From the food, stores to the overall design, I don’t feel that way about Prudential. Theyve made some steps towards being a more unique sporting experience, but not enough of a jump, especially in comparison.
AlpineSK
I’m guessing they gave points for “Pinkest chicken tenders.”
pdubbs87
I like prudential a lot more than the rest of you guys do. I don’t go to a hockey game to eat a buffet though
SkellySkeletor
The stadium itself is fine, very fast entrance exit times which you can’t say for every arena and the building itself/surrounding area is decently pleasant. However, the food experience always seems to be a disaster of mismanagement, poor staffing, and poor quality control. I really don’t know what is going wrong with them because this is two vendors that have came her and whiffed hard now
6 Comments
> When scoring the responses from each venue, FSO said the following was considered:
> Novel technologies that improve and enhance the gameday experience
> New approaches to simplifying and speeding up the merchandise and concessions process
>Exciting and engaging menu items
>Efficient ingress, egress and wayfinding
>Facilitated transportation
>Easy access to wireless connectivity
>Physical and cybersecurity
>Mixed-use development opportunities
>Venue design features
…which explains why we would all disagree…
Exciting and engaging chicken tenders as far as the eye can see.
Team store featuring a Dazzling array of the same three jerseys for three years straight.
Woo!
Going to Citi field this weekend and I don’t care if the Mets win or lose, the stadium experience is so worth the trip. From the food, stores to the overall design, I don’t feel that way about Prudential. Theyve made some steps towards being a more unique sporting experience, but not enough of a jump, especially in comparison.
I’m guessing they gave points for “Pinkest chicken tenders.”
I like prudential a lot more than the rest of you guys do. I don’t go to a hockey game to eat a buffet though
The stadium itself is fine, very fast entrance exit times which you can’t say for every arena and the building itself/surrounding area is decently pleasant. However, the food experience always seems to be a disaster of mismanagement, poor staffing, and poor quality control. I really don’t know what is going wrong with them because this is two vendors that have came her and whiffed hard now