Mastodon
@Vancouver Canucks

Me going back in time to the 2014 draft but getting detained by security just before I make it to the Canucks table.



Me going back in time to the 2014 draft but getting detained by security just before I make it to the Canucks table.

by Blink_Dragstar

11 Comments

  1. SkidmarkDave

    That was an Aquilini pick, imo. Benning had only been around a month at that point… I think Aquilini told Linden he wanted Virtanen

  2. Beautiful_Echoes

    Could have had Nylander and Pastrnak

  3. Malforian

    What’s this related to never heard of 2014 issues in drafting

  4. Nucksfan23

    We could’ve had Nylander and Pastrnak 😭

  5. PaperweightCoaster

    Eh, at the time, Pasta would’ve been a reach. Hindsight says yes but the consensus favourites would’ve been Ehlers or Nylander.

  6. pusch85

    If we pick Pasta, we don’t get Petey or Hughes.

    These retrospective draft posts always bother me because picking some player who would become better doesn’t always result in the best outcomes.

  7. Count3D

    That was one of the first drafts I paid attention to. Without knowing much about prospects back then, I do remember a lot of you saying we should have picked Nylander or Ehlers. Time has proven those choices correct.

  8. SourGrapesFTW

    24 other teams passed on Pastrnak as well.

  9. NotoriousBananaHavoc

    I think Pasta worked from circumstances Boston was able to grow his talent with the talent they had/have we didn’t until Petey and Huggy was drafted

  10. kazin29

    With perfect hindsight? Trade down for multiple picks. Take guys like Fiala, Pastrnak (available at 24), Montour, and Point!

    Also keep Forsling.

  11. JerbearCuddles

    Nice hindsight meme. Pasta went 25th. Nylander or Ehlers would have been better for the meme. Less hindsighty and realistic with who people may have realistically wanted at the time. Although we did take McCann one pick before Pasta.

Write A Comment