[https://predlines.com/2023/07/25/nashville-predators-projecting-forward-lines-after-free-agency/](https://predlines.com/2023/07/25/nashville-predators-projecting-forward-lines-after-free-agency/)
These seem like pretty reasonable line. I love the line debates. Thoughts?
Novak/Parssinen seems forced, but I think the justifications on lines 2 make sense. If we needed a change of scenery, I wouldn’t mind seeing Parssinen possibly on the RW with Tomasino-Glass. Hopefully this 3rd line combo can help Novaks horrible defensive play, but this could be a crucial depth line for scoring chances. This 3rd line could be where we see lots of Barrie/Josi points come in with Novaks big brain in the offensive zone.
I like Sherwood on the herd line. I could see him/Cole Smith split time, especially on the PK, but Sherwood has the higher scoring potential and I think had a great run at the end of last year with Tomasino-Novak I believe (or was it Novak-Evangelista?) and deserves a chance. He also posted up with Tage Thompson which was awesome that he got that a scoring threat off the ice. I am a Sherwood fan.
by KaleidoscopeOk1346
3 Comments
Post the lines, I’m too lazy.
There’s no chance Nyquist is on the first line lmao
Parsy, Tomasino and Glass or Parsy, Evangelista, Glass would have me 😍😍🤤🤤
ETA: okay, now I read the article and I don’t see Novak or Parsy being on the third line as ‘unfair’. One of my hills last season was run 3 scoring lines + the herd, and that’s exactly what 3C Novak would give us. And I think that’s more in line with what I’ve read about Brunette.