The Boston Bruins have a go-ahead goal called back in the third period after it is deemed that Charlie Coyle enters the Montreal Canadiens’ zone ahead of the puck, for a close offside call.
———————————————-
Subscribe to Sportsnet on YouTube – http://sprtsnt.ca/2paAT2L
Visit Sportsnet.ca for more sports news and highlights – http://www.sportsnet.ca
Follow Sportsnet on Facebook – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTFB
Follow Sportsnet on Twitter – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTTWTR
Follow Sportsnet on Instagram – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTINST
Follow Sportsnet on Snapchat – http://sprtsnt.ca/YTSNAP
Watch Sportsnet on Sportsnet Now – http://sportsnet.ca/now
26 Comments
That seems more judgment call on when possession started than conclusive evidence he was offside to me.
Offside. Good call
Offside rules are so busted and taken too far, way to make the game a bit less fun.
When somebody figures out what constitutes offsides , could you please let the NHL know? That'd be great, thanks.
That that happens to toronto every game
C'mon Bruins, its about time you got a regulation loss :$
The refs took way too long. If it is that hard to figure out the call, it should stand. The offsides rules is suppose to only fix egregious offsides.
Pathetic, wrong for a few reasons….
Check the standings B's are still to nice for the stinky habs. Montreal has to cheat to win and they're still horrible
😆😆😆
🔵⚪🔴
Bleu_Blanc_Rouge
Forever!
That's not offside.
To all who says it's a bad call. LMAO. His right skate passed the blue line will the puck is still on the line. @0:36
Honestly offside challenge should be a judgement call
I thought there was an exception to entering before the puck if you had full possession?? He was totally in control of the puck and his wing didn’t jump. I’ve seen worse been called good goal. Horseshit call.
Finesse progress of the play!Bettman and refs hate the old school heart of the game.
I’m more surprised the far winger wasn’t offside. Solid read on the play. And if offsides by mm can be reviewed then so should penalties.
Despite the Bruins fans moaning, the reality is the dude was offside. If you prefer to leave the call to the judgement of the linesman, I'm fine with that, but that's not what we've got these days.
For real how the hell is that conclusive. I am no more than 30% confident in either choice. How they overturn that conclusively is insane
His butt is onside
offside by a frame (maybe…if you see that as ¨conclusive¨)=no goal…The puck hit the mesh in playoff=good goal!!! Thanks NHL to make me work on my patience…
They should change off-sides back to the way it used to be the whole "possession" bullshit just muddies the waters.
I definitely agree with the no goal it’s was offside
That's off side, the skate logically went fully over the entire line first before the puck fully crossed the line.
Looks like he had control of the puck to me. I thought that was considered on side?
Offside. Sorry, rule's a rule
The TV guys are wrong about what their best look is. There's a still frame at 0:27 that conclusively shows white between skates and blue line and none between puck and blue line. I wouldn't question the linie for missing that in real time, but on the video, that is undoubtedly offsides.