Articles from The Athletic are flagged as possible paywall until a moderator can confirm whether the article is unlocked or not. After the flair has been set the sidebar filter will work properly.
Please limit summaries to 2-3 paragraphs maximum – posting full articles from paywalled sites is not allowed here out of fairness to those that subscribe.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/DetroitRedWings) if you have any questions or concerns.*
leftlanemine
Cool article I couldn’t read. Thanks for posting!!!
E: I don’t understand why you guys are so adamant about posting these every single time. If you’re subscribed to them you already know and if you’re aren’t then you are just waiving it in my face that I don’t get to read it. This is a forum for discussion where you guys post info not everyone has access to. I will never understand how I’m the dick here.
TAV63
CBJ prospects were supposed to be the hard ones to beat. They lost to Dallas. Did not see it but sounded like Soderblom looked good. So that is a positive since he needs to take a big step this year.
bellringer16
Kasper impressed me. Danielson didn’t. I thought Soderblom,Kasper, and Sawchuk looked like the best forwards.
BlakeDatAzzUp
You could tell that Detroit wasn’t engaged in-front of the net. They were content with ‘flow’ hockey. We definitely did a good job cycling and hemming their D into the zone but they were all ineffective at driving the net.
Danielsson, Mazur, Kasper all look small.
I liked Gibson on the back end. Lombardi was a dart. Punnett’s scrap was fun.
Carbon__addiction
Sawczuk looked very good. One of the best players on the ice. Soda looked outstanding, leagues above everyone else. Marco was trying hard but no results, Lombardi looked just ok, Danielson I also thought looked just ok. Cossa did not look good imo, Bednar looked better to me. Wallinder did pretty well but not exceptional. Tuomisto looked considerably better than last time I saw him. Wouldn’t say he did excellent but certainly has improved.
AWokenBeetle
Tuomisto has an absolute bomb shot, dude was putting howitzers on net
numbdigits
Soderblom looked great, otherwise a pretty unspectacular showing from what is allegedly one of the better prospect pools in the league. Only a single prospects tournament game played so hardly a sample size worth criticizing, but certainly did not make me feel any more confident about Kasper and Danielson being better offensively than I felt they would be at time of draft.
8 Comments
Articles from The Athletic are flagged as possible paywall until a moderator can confirm whether the article is unlocked or not. After the flair has been set the sidebar filter will work properly.
Please limit summaries to 2-3 paragraphs maximum – posting full articles from paywalled sites is not allowed here out of fairness to those that subscribe.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/DetroitRedWings) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Cool article I couldn’t read. Thanks for posting!!!
E: I don’t understand why you guys are so adamant about posting these every single time. If you’re subscribed to them you already know and if you’re aren’t then you are just waiving it in my face that I don’t get to read it. This is a forum for discussion where you guys post info not everyone has access to. I will never understand how I’m the dick here.
CBJ prospects were supposed to be the hard ones to beat. They lost to Dallas. Did not see it but sounded like Soderblom looked good. So that is a positive since he needs to take a big step this year.
Kasper impressed me. Danielson didn’t. I thought Soderblom,Kasper, and Sawchuk looked like the best forwards.
You could tell that Detroit wasn’t engaged in-front of the net. They were content with ‘flow’ hockey. We definitely did a good job cycling and hemming their D into the zone but they were all ineffective at driving the net.
Danielsson, Mazur, Kasper all look small.
I liked Gibson on the back end. Lombardi was a dart. Punnett’s scrap was fun.
Sawczuk looked very good. One of the best players on the ice. Soda looked outstanding, leagues above everyone else. Marco was trying hard but no results, Lombardi looked just ok, Danielson I also thought looked just ok. Cossa did not look good imo, Bednar looked better to me. Wallinder did pretty well but not exceptional. Tuomisto looked considerably better than last time I saw him. Wouldn’t say he did excellent but certainly has improved.
Tuomisto has an absolute bomb shot, dude was putting howitzers on net
Soderblom looked great, otherwise a pretty unspectacular showing from what is allegedly one of the better prospect pools in the league. Only a single prospects tournament game played so hardly a sample size worth criticizing, but certainly did not make me feel any more confident about Kasper and Danielson being better offensively than I felt they would be at time of draft.