Mastodon
@Vancouver Canucks

[Pagnotta] There seems to be some movement on the Conor Garland front; hearing a 3rd team could be in play. Talks w/ teams like Preds, Caps, CBJ & at least 1 more Eastern team are ongoing. The Canucks want this done sooner than later, but $$ is a big factor. How creative can they get?



[Pagnotta] There seems to be some movement on the Conor Garland front; hearing a 3rd team could be in play. Talks w/ teams like Preds, Caps, CBJ & at least 1 more Eastern team are ongoing. The Canucks want this done sooner than later, but $$ is a big factor. How creative can they get?

by electricnux

28 Comments

  1. awayfromcanuck

    Pagnotta usually doesn’t have accurate information on what is going on with the Canucks but he’s also right once in a while so … Who knows how accurate this is.

  2. Fine..we’ll take Ovi and Crosby for Garland and Myers and some picks for absorbing their caps

  3. HughesHiroseHentai

    Finally. It’s been a while since we were involved in a 3 way deal.

  4. great_save_luongo

    This will definitely make us a better team except it won’t at all.

  5. wingdingcanuck

    Impossible, there’s no former Penguins on any of those teams except… Erik Gudbranson oh SHIT

  6. Wasn’t it the Blue Jackets who were reportedly trying to get rid of a defenseman?

  7. Cautiously optimistic given that it’s Pagnotta.

    He’s usually a mile off or hits the nail on the head. There is no inbetween with him.

  8. arazamatazguy

    Just don’t retain, just don’t retain, just don’t retain…..Canucks are going to retain.

  9. Surprising. Not that this is a thing but that details been put out there publicly. Canucks have been running a tight ship for the most part.

  10. NerdPunch

    I wonder if that 3rd team is there as a salary broker? Something like this for a framework.

    **Team A**
    – Conor Garland (retained)

    **Team B**
    – Futures From Team A
    – Small sweetener from Van

    **Vancouver**
    – Pocket Change/Future Considerations

  11. GameofCHAT

    Montreal now that Dach is gone for the season? Montreal has D, Vancouver wants D

  12. BroliasBoesersson

    If we have to retain salary I swear to god man

  13. ToyStrecher

    If Preds. Garland for Fabbro pls. (I know that won’t happen, but it’s not the farthest shot)

  14. BrodyCanuck

    Garland honestly isn’t even really over paid. It’d be stupid for the long term to give up something just to clear some cap for a player that isn’t over paid in my opinion.

    If you think he’s over paid what do you think he’s actually worth? 4.5m? That’s barely even below what he gets, why give up something just to save such a little amount?

    Please canucks don’t trade him if we have to give up something of value.

  15. Pagnotta so probably not true but when this trade goes down its gonna suck for us, no way we come out on top here lol

  16. Not entirely sure how the Caps would fit into this but I guess they gotta try something.

  17. dmancman2

    Smarter people than me on here could figure out what that Erickson trade ultimately cost us…it seems like it cost us dearly

  18. > a 3rd team… Preds, Caps, CBJ & at least 1 more Eastern team

    That is four teams.

  19. N4ZZY2020

    I don’t understand the excessive need to get rid of garland. Why is this current management so desperate to rid him?

  20. I don’t understand any point of this unless you’re getting a RD that’s similar in talent as Garland. You aren’t getting a winger that’s better than Garland at his price point

Write A Comment