Mastodon
@Carolina Hurricanes

7 Players YOU SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED | Fantasy Hockey 2023/24



———————————————
00:00 INTRO
00:55 – Trevor Zegras
02:17 – Linus Ullmark
03:52 – Ivan Barbashev
04:54 – Patrik Laine
05:47 – Seth Jarvis
06:52 – Evan Bouchard
07:53 – Filip Forsberg
09:01 – OUTRO
———————————————-
All Stats from https://www.hockey-reference.com/
———————————————-
๐Ÿšจ Check out our content here ๐Ÿšจ – https://linktr.ee/FantasyPuck
———————————————-
๐ŸŽฅ Get access to our premium features including sign up for our Patreon Fantasy Leagues – https://www.patreon.com/fantasypuck ๐ŸŽฅ
———————————————-
๐Ÿ‘‰๐Ÿฝ Looking to work with us? Business Email – fantasypuck99@gmail.com ๐Ÿ‘ˆ๐Ÿฝ
———————————————-
๐Ÿ‘‹ SOCIAL MEDIA ๐Ÿ‘‹
@Fantasy_Puck
———————————————-
Discord Link: https://discord.gg/7ZvCKMMTUn

26 Comments

  1. I have gustavsson and got offered vasilevskiy in a 1 for 1 trade. Do I do it or are we afraid of lingering issues from surgery?

  2. Love to see it ๐Ÿ”ฅ Drafted Forsberg and Bouchard in 2/3 leagues and Laine in 1/3

    More importantly, Forsberg & Bouchard in my FPPL League ๐Ÿ˜Ž

  3. You should have made this video tomorrow after Clayton Keller goes off tonight against Jersey and Jack Hughes!

    Keller, Caufield, Bedard, Zacha and Cozens will be all steals in the end.

    I much prefer Troy Terry over Zegras as the periphs are better and goal scoring is more valuable

  4. Forsberg is an elite LW who is especially valuable in leagues that count HIT. In cat leagues, he has always been a highly valuable LW to draft.
    Now let's not make quick conclusions after 2 games because his problems remain the same. He's an injury prone guy and will very likely land on IR sooner than later which will be a problem because this guy is always drafted in the first 10 rounds. Finally, his 2021-22 season was a fluke. Not a single Preds was able to replicate his season last year (2022-23). With the lack of talent surrounding Forsberg, I doubt he will be a 85+ pts LW. 70+ if healthy at best which is already great. The lack of talent will allow him to fire the puck for no descent reason so his SOG/gp should be easily 3.0+.

    Now about Ullmark I've never got the analysis of most "experts" ๐Ÿคฃ. The Bruins lost Bergy who wasn't great at all for his last season and Krejci who was nowhere an elite top 6 C any longer. Orlov arrived in Boston for the PO only and he didn't factor positively at all. Marchand was playing injured last season so even though he's definitely regressing, he cannot do worse than last season. And you have Pasta who is at his prime. The only decrease of value of Ullmark comes from the fact that the Bruins could win less game since they didn't replace their 2 top Cs. For the rest, of course he's not going to put the same elite numbers as last season but it doesn't mean anything. He was elite in his own league. A regression could mean to be like Shes, Vasi, or Hellebuyck. Not bad at all right? ๐Ÿคฃ.
    Last season, people drafted Swayman early and Ullmark late for the result we know. This season I feel like the best option was to do the opposite. Let people draft Ullmark early to get Swayman late.

  5. Zegras will stay average until he grows up and matures. All he cares about is himself atm. Until he is able to put his team ahead of himselfโ€ฆ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

  6. Going to drop DeBrusk due to not making PP1. Most of the players you highlighted here are available: Laine, Forsberg, Zegras and Zacha. Was thinking of staying with BOS and going Zacha, thoughts?

  7. I agree with all the players that you stated. I have most of them on my team actually. Jarvis was a disappointment last year for me so I avoided him. Im curious though whats your thoughts on Matt Duchene? Good sleeper or should I see if theres interest in my league and flip him?

  8. No I was looking at Troy Terry or Mason Mctavish. Get the points without the drama. Let someone else take the prima dona.
    I wish I'd taken Ullmark. Thought about it. They are still going to get 100 points and their defense is great. Yes I wish I'd taken Ullmark.
    I'm not taking Barbashev.

    Laine was popular and went 63rd and 64th in my two pools His NHL best to date is 70 points. he's more likely to give you 50 and not be healthy. We draft for the full season. I ended up with fantilli at 146. That is plenty of Blue Jackets.
    Bouchard was popular and went 70th and 89th and I took Timo Meier just before him when he went 89th. I'm going to stick with meier. Yes he was a point a game guy in the playoffs. I think their power play steps back a bit.
    Seth Jarvis is good.

    I got Forsberg. Only guy they have. Good call.

  9. For Ullmark; it's a question of league format. He is absolutely not worth the draft slot in a points league format because there's no way he wins 40 games in a split goalie situation given the alternatives. But for categories leagues where he dropped to like rounds 4-6 then absolutely agree with the take

  10. I went

    Thompson
    Crosby
    Guntzel
    BrAtt
    Jarry
    Hubby
    Zucha
    Seth jones
    Dought
    EkbLd
    I dominate 3 dmen strTegy

    To stream forward or a goalie

    I wS down 37
    Just came back and took the lead
    Hopefully we can pull thru

  11. I have forsberg on my team and I dropped Seth Jarvis to activate ehlers should I pick Jarvis back up and drop one of zacha, Raymond, or Wilson and should I drop forsling for power

  12. Do I keep Luke Hughes or drop him for Matheson on Montreal? Goals are 2 points, assists 1 point, PPP are half of those, blocks are 0.4, hits are 0.2 Matheson seems to have the higher potential with the power play position and peripherals

Write A Comment