Mastodon
@Carolina Hurricanes

Rangers Should Consider Chatfield Trade With Hurricanes



“The Hurricanes are a strong team so they won’t be looking for a lot in return.”

I’ll open this ~~bullshit article~~ interesting take to the floor for comments.

https://www.yardbarker.com/nhl/articles/rangers_should_consider_chatfield_trade_with_hurricanes/s1_16448_39484922

by notyomamasusername

28 Comments

  1. “Vesey could fit into their bottom six over Jesper Fast” ……yeah, no.

  2. ScroatyMcBoogerwolfe

    I feel like Chatty is the wrong piece to consider moving currently.

    ETA: I think Chatty should be a long term piece of our team. He’s undervalued just like Slavin.

  3. No bullshit, Chatty is our best defensemen. Not gonna happen.

  4. JKthePolishGhost

    This is like that article where the flyers were gonna receive Pesce for like a bag of bolts and Hart.

  5. the rangers should consider eating my whole dick and ass

  6. WoodsFinder

    lol…that’s ridiculous. Chatty is worth WAY more than Vesey and a third.

    If they call GMDW with that offer, the response should be something like “Those are decent add-ons, but who’s the main player? If it’s Trocheck and you’ll retain 50%, we can talk.”

  7. WoodsFinder

    Those guys in New York are delusional, aren’t they? First the Aho is dirty nonsense and now this. Crazy.

  8. psyopsono

    Ah yes I’m sure we will trade a key defenseman to our rival for a 3rd round and a mediocre depth guy. This dude shouldn’t have a job.

  9. Gadzookie2

    I really like Chatfield but think this would make sense (although not with the return listed). People are saying to trade TdA, but right now his return value would be super low.

    Chatfield is clearly being underutilized in our system and if we are to try and change something I think he would be a decent piece to move.

  10. blinker1eighty2

    Man anyone can be a sports reporter these days

  11. dankbuttersteez

    The Rangers should absolutely consider it and waste all that time.

  12. macaroni_3000

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA yes other teams exist to send the Rangers their players. What a fucking typical take from NY media

  13. TheCaniac30

    My official response:

    Bagels are a lesser form of biscuit.

  14. Like17Badgers

    yeah… totally gonna trade a rising star for a guy who’s older, has worse performances and stats, less playoff experience, and costs more.

    we’ll get RIGHT on that.

    you know, people would stop saying Rangers fans know jack all about the sport if Rangers fans didn’t ***constantly*** prove they know jack all about the sport

  15. Typical smooth-brained NY media take.

    >That lowly country hockey club should be overjoyed to consider the esteemed Rangers to take one of their most cost-effective two-way D-men for little to no benefit.

  16. timbuttons

    Ship em TDA for a large pizza and a night in Soho

  17. bearwhidrive

    The Rangers should consider taking Tony DeAngelo in exchange for Panarin and a 4th.

    Content farm THAT.

  18. mindseyecoil

    Chatfield is a goddamn gem and I refuse to see him sullied by a Rags jersey. They don’t deserve him.

  19. framingXjake

    Lmao, they want Chatfield for nothing. Delusional. Rags can suck it.

  20. CaniacGoji

    I would only consider a Chatfield trade if they’re sending Panarin, Shesty, Fox, Miller, Kreider, Zibanejad, retail 100% of their salary, and offer their next 3 first rounders.

  21. tbyrdistheword

    The writer of this article can kiss the fattest part of my fat white ass.

Write A Comment